home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
Aminet 23
/
Aminet 23 (1998)(GTI - Schatztruhe)[!][Feb 1998].iso
/
Aminet
/
dev
/
amos
/
AMOS1097.lzh
/
AMOSLIST
/
000335_amos-request@svcs1.digex.net_Fri Oct 31 00:11:11 1997.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1997-11-02
|
3KB
Received: from svcs1.digex.net (svcs1.digex.net [204.91.197.224])
by mail2.access.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA26206
for <mcox@access.digex.net>; Fri, 31 Oct 1997 00:11:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA16825
for amos-out; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 22:57:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mail2.access.digex.net (mail2.access.digex.net [205.197.247.3])
by svcs1.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA16822
for <amos-list@svcs1.digex.net>; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 22:57:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from geocities.com ([209.1.224.23])
by mail2.access.digex.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id WAA19859
for <amos-list@access.digex.net>; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 22:57:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from acer200 (tul-ok4-01.ix.netcom.com [204.31.234.129])
by geocities.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA14765;
Thu, 30 Oct 1997 19:54:44 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199710310354.TAA14765@geocities.com>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <parrottsoft@mail.geocities.com>
From: "Adam Parrott" <parrottsoft@usa.net>
Organization: Parrottsoft, Ltd.
To: Andy Gibson <andy@agasinc.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 21:54:39 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Pro Version
Reply-to: parrottsoft@usa.net
CC: amos-list@access.digex.net
Priority: normal
In-reply-to: <yam7241.1078.3009960@post.demon.co.uk>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v2.54)
Status: O
X-Status:
Greetings.
> It seems weird to me that some peeps have Amos Pro V2.01 and I
> only have Pro V2.00!
hm, "peeps", eh? "Well well well, lookie what we have here."
> I bought Amos Pro and the Compiler many years ago when they were
> both readily available from mail order. My copy of the
> compiler only updated my version of Amos Pro to V2.00 and not V2.01!
Technically (aside from version numbers), there ARE nO differences
between the two different versions. To my knowledge, there were no
major bugs fixed or significant updates made between the two
versions, so there's not REALLY any need for concern (unless you
really want to waste the money to update).
> Can anyone out there really confirm that there *IS* as V2.01?
Yes, I *CAN* (and WILL if you want) do this. I OWN it.
`Remember: the only thing that hurts more than paying
income tax is not having to pay income tax.'
Adam Parrott, personal: parrotta@usa.net, work: parrottsoft@usa.net
Member of Team *AMOS* and the IAPA. http://members.tripod.com/~parrottsoft